Thursday, October 11, 2007

Orange face; black heart: David Dein is personally hollowing out the soul of Arsenal Football Club

Q: What's worse than an eerie, jeans-rocking hotshot Russian billionaire with an immorally-acquired pile, a risible semi-beard and a fleeting interest in English football?

A: A fat, balding, greasy old Russian billionaire with an immorally-acquired pile, vicious lawyers and a fleeting interest in your English football club.

It's close mighty close but Alisher Usmanov takes it.

And this, my friends, is the grubby territory in which we Arsenal fans now find ourselves: rating football’s bloated Soviet super-fiends.

While it would have previously been impossible to view Roman Abramovich in a preferential sense (over any other object in the known universe, living or dead), one orange-faced former Arsenal linchpin has succeeded in bringing about this minor miracle: by saddling our beloved club with a Russian oligarch even more disreputable and despicable than Chelsea's whey-faced pension plunderer.

Step up, David Dein: the self-styled Messiah who now finds himself jostling for contention on the All Time Football Villains podium, next to the likes of Kenyon, Edwards, Bates and the amassing hordes of crooked foreign sugar daddies like Usmanov. How, one wonders, did it come to this?

Glib put-downs aside, Dein's literally breathtaking desire to move heaven and earth to sell Arsenal to dubious American and Russian uber-investors (read that again: move heaven and earth to sell Arsenal to dubious American and Russian uber-investors) has genuinely left me feeling furious and crushed in equal measure.

…Which is far from a good combination. Remembering what it’s like to be a lump-throated, brooding, powerless adolescent does one no favours on a bleary-eyed Tuesday morning at work. Chairman Peter-Hill Wood chillingly described Dein last month as the “architect” of Arsenal’s just-beginning saga of instability and turmoil. Never, for me, has that word carried such menace, or signified such a heartbreaking blueprint as the one that looms ahead.

The situation beggars belief. What on earth possessed Dein to begin crudely and aggressively hollowing out the venerable infrastructure of English football's most treasured club — a club he once helped dazzle the world with its modern, Wenger-branded incarnation of free-scoring teams full of Highbury-made superstars?

The answer, of course, lies therein. David Dein believes it is his Arsenal that have reached the cusp of immortality; his years of globe-schmoozing, of clearing and shoring-up Wenger’s path that have chiselled the club into the sparkling, poised vehicle it is today. But Dein has made that classic egotists’ mistake: substituting the part (his part) for the whole. When he speaks of what is ‘crucial to Arsenal’s future’, the ‘Arsenal’ in question is simply the Arsenal of Dein’s mind’s eye — a club made in the London businessman’s fallow, megalomaniacal image.

Make no mistake: Arsenal was there long before this speculative chancer, and even longer before the Murdoch-inspired hubris of the 1990s — the swollen footballing puberty which made craven, turn-tail millionaires of every one of Dein's jackpot generation. His, ultimately, is a cautionary tale of the highest order: fattened and blinded by the gruesome stratospherics of the modern football machine (the machine that made him the bullying cash-calf he is today), David Dein’s soul, intellect and loyalty have been irreparably derailed.

Accordingly, his warped notions of how Arsenal should ‘progress’ are, of course, as transparently self-serving as they are misguided. What, in the grand scheme of things, does an organisation like Arsenal Football Club really need? Step back and consider, in layman’s terms, a happy, successful, respected, family-owned club with bulging gates, loyal fans, an incomparable manager and a crop of abundantly talented young players; consider a steady, honest business with exciting new premises and an on-target repayment plan — Christ! Every sports club or business in England would weep tears of blood to boast such a sturdy, successful ship.

As I write, this Dein-less ship currently sits clear at the top of the Premiership, and top of its Champions League group, having recently dispatched one of Europe’s most highly-fancied contenders, Sevilla, 3-0 in front of 120,000 enraptured eyes. Pay a visit to the Emirates any time in the near future (if you can find a seat) and you’ll come away with a much better idea of what Arsenal Football Club is ‘lacking’.

Now consider that the man who professes his “love” for Arsenal at every available opportunity has decreed that dragging the club through a hostile takeover, dismantling the powers of the country’s longest-serving board and injecting an unsustainable speedball of immorally-obtained roubles is the way forward. Forgive me if I have failed to spot the romance here. To say Dein is fooling no one would be the biggest understatement since a young Reichstag clerk casually remarked that he felt Hitler was becoming a little “narky” with the Jews.

The truth is, of course, that David Dein probably cares for the Ruskies and the Yanks as little as Peter Hill-Wood does. But all sentiments have been cast aside — including any shred of care or respect for Arsenal itself — in his now-unfettered crusade to become both club chairman and (moreover) the shiny-toothed public pivot of a Deinist-Arsenal superfuture.

The plain facts, however, will forever convict him: Dein, an investor, invested; and, some years later, he got an investor’s return — to the tune of £75m of dirty Russian notes. Job done; transaction complete. Moreover, it seems to have entirely escaped Dein that Arsenal is just a football club — not a globe-gobbling corporate canvas to be leached, bleached and scrawled on with ludicrous multinational designs.

You got yours, David, and so fittingly, too. How I wish that you had left us to ours.

The awful reality, however, is that the fuse is now lit, and our fate lies essentially in the hands of Stan Kroenke — the American who surely will only take a certain amount of fiscal ‘convincing’ from the Dein-Usmanov vehicle to relinquish the key to the city: those all-important, balance-tipping (and again, Dein-brokered) shares. Nice work, David. You vile, poisoned, retributive, sanctimonious, puffed-up, fickle, graceless, shortsighted excuse for a person. What an awful, crude, unnecessary mess.

If we can force ourselves to treat Dein as a human in any manner, it can only be to ascribe him this sorrowful epitaph:

Streaking oil on white sand. Grinning crazedly. Burning the past. Irradiating the future.

For these, apparently, are the words endlessly repeating in his delusional mind.

Thank you, David Dein. For selling out the club to a Manchester United fan; for colluding with a despicable mercenary; for schmoozing brazenly with Spurs; for abusing and destroying everything Arsenal gave you. Thank you so much. Rest assured: there will never be a single Arsenal fan, present or future, who is not made fully aware of the ‘part’ you have played in our history.

Vultures may circle, but we must stand firm.

A version of this article is featured in this month's Gooner, Arsenal's premier fanzine

-----------------------


For the latest on the deplorable affair entitled "Usmanov and his bully-boy lawyers create a PR implosion by shutting down the blog of former Usbek ambassador Craig Murray (and also the blogs of Tim Ireland, Boris Johnson and countless others in the process) because he vehemently denounced the corpulent thug for the corpulent thug he is", visit the specially created bloggerheads site:

http://b-heads.blogspot.com/

For Murray’s original (and now removed) article, click here:

http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/09/380565.html

Let's see, as an experiment, whether Usmanov's shadowy net police are thorough enough to incinerate a mere whippersnapper, such as myself, for offering a few droplets of 'untruth' to the world...

4 comments:

LeeNocturnal said...

Some real passionate views there, well articulated and structured too - although the level of vitriol spewed forth in the general direction of dodgy Dave does seem a little OTT at times! Obviously not top of your christmas card list, eh?

I do agree with you up to a point - Dein's dalliance with shady foreign investors is probably the single biggest threat to the stability of AFC in recent times. For some reason though, I'm inclined to believe that his decision to move towards outside investment was made with the best intentions. Unfortunately, the whole situation has blown up in his face and made him look like a complete twat out to sabotage the club we love.

As Dein is so fond of pointing out at every opportunity, he was the main force behind the appointment of Wenger, and for the past 10 years he has taken a hands on role in the day to day running of the club, dealing with all contract negotiations and providing a direct link between the players and the board. By all accounts he has been held in high regard by most of the senior players throughout this time (if Thierry’s claim that Dein’s exit was partially responsible for his decision to leave was less than believable, the fact that his son was best man at his wedding speaks volumes)

The fact that Arsene still counts him as a personal friend despite the circumstances surrounding his exit (not to mention his subsequent bleating in the press) also suggests that Dein isn’t quite the big, bad wolf that he is being made out to be. If there were any genuine underhand tactics or a real intention to harm the club simply to further his own career, I’m sure Wenger would have severed all ties and basically disowned the guy.

There is no denying that Dein is a passionate Arsenal fan who (rightly) feels a close bond to the club after 20 years of service. In my opinion, it is this passion that has been his downfall. He saw the investment being made at the other big 3 clubs and believed that we would need to go down the same road or risk getting left behind. Obviously that view has since been proven to be nonsense, but at the time the decision to go against the boards wishes was made, you can understand his thinking and there is a case to be made that he had the club’s best interests at heart, however deluded and misguided that decision has turned out to be.

Personally, I think he got carried away with trying to repeat his ‘visionary’ masterstroke of 1996 when he decided to bring Wenger in. He has been living off and taking full credit for that decision ever since, and maybe he thought that by being the man to usher in a new era of big money foreign investment, he would be heralded as the hero exec that took Arsenal to the next level once again. Obviously, he didn’t do his homework about who he was getting involved with, and is now finding out the hard way that if you lie down with dogs, you wake up with fleas.

I think his actions post-sacking have been borne out of desperation and frustration more than any genuine intention to harm AFC. He has gone from one of the leading figures at the club, respected by fans, players and fellow execs alike to a total pariah who is seen only as a significant threat to our continued success. His intended masterstroke has completely backfired and it’s sad to see that in a misguided attempt to secure his legacy at the club, he has undone all the positive contributions he has made over the past 20 years. He is undoubtedly a massive, massive prat, but I think the way he has been demonised by fans and sections of the press is a little sensationalist to say the least.

geordie said...

How did I forget to put you in my feedreader?

Ewen said...

@ Lee:

For my part, I don't believe you can demonise the devil himself.

My strong reaction to Dein is based on the simple fact that, if we indeed consider his ('best') intentions, he... intentionally sold out to the Russians, with the firm intention that the club's ownership should fall into the hands of a dodgy, foreign investor.

Thus, his intention was, in the simplest sense, to radically usurp Arsenal's longstanding infrastructure.

And no one who "loves" Arsenal could do that.

His is, by and large, a unilateral intention - the very same which got him kicked off the board in the first place.

Dein did a great service, but when his motives parted company - radically - with that of the board's (who are Arsenal) he was unceremoniously exiled.

Are we to believe that the board have anything other than pure motives? Of course not. We might, of course, appreciate that perhaps Dein has seen the 'best' finanical or business-related way forward for the club, and that he is trusting his own 'vision'.

But the final arbiter must be Wenger, who, while he has not openly criticised his friend, has certainly offered nothing but praise for the board's actions - both now and of yesteryear.

Anonymous said...

Good day !.
You may , perhaps very interested to know how one can reach 2000 per day of income .
There is no initial capital needed You may begin to receive yields with as small sum of money as 20-100 dollars.

AimTrust is what you haven`t ever dreamt of such a chance to become rich
The firm represents an offshore structure with advanced asset management technologies in production and delivery of pipes for oil and gas.

Its head office is in Panama with structures around the world.
Do you want to become really rich in short time?
That`s your choice That`s what you desire!

I`m happy and lucky, I began to take up real money with the help of this company,
and I invite you to do the same. If it gets down to select a proper companion who uses your savings in a right way - that`s the AimTrust!.
I earn US$2,000 per day, and what I started with was a funny sum of 500 bucks!
It`s easy to get involved , just click this link http://uhazumuzy.digitalzones.com/ipykexit.html
and lucky you`re! Let`s take our chance together to become rich