Thursday, March 06, 2008

Calling all rational people: join Stop the War Coalition in Trafalgar Square on March 15

Saturday 4th December’s wonderfully well-attended international StopWar conference in Westminster – the first since 2005 – was both encouraging and chastening, as a critical period looms in which the sheer gall and inhumanity of the US/UK regime threatens to swell to proportions both unprecedented and unthinkable. Which is saying something.

http://www.stopwar.org.uk/

The remorselessly excellent Stop the War Coalition has now joined with CND and the British Muslim Initiative in calling a demonstration to mark the fifth anniversary of the reprehensible Iraq invasion in London on Saturday March 15. The demo – which will demand that our troops leave Iraq and Afghanistan, and call for an end to the inexcusably scripted aggression towards Iran – will coincide with World Against War marches around the globe.

I’ll say it clearly. Be there.

It is not enough to muse that the noises emanating from the genocidal Bush adminstration about Iran ‘do not look promising.’ Flagrantly threatening, illegally occupying and committing mass murder in yet another sovereign territory in the Persian Gulf – yet again under the flimsiest of pretences: aiding ‘insurrectionists’ in Iraq; desiring nuclear weapons – simply cannot be swallowed and watched passively on television screens once again, unthinkingly, as if those families and hands and bones were mere gnats and dust.

As former UN humanitarian coordinator in Iraq Hans von Sponeck said in December, you do not have to agree with the every action and policy of the government of the Islamic Republic of Iran in order to oppose the violent and illegal burning of its citizens by the West’s military.

Be absolutely clear: if the US launches an illegal attack on Iran (or any other innocent citizenry), with the backing of our government, we will be guilty for all eternity if we do not coordinate and mobilise a fundamental physical resistance in the UK and beyond. Given what each and every one of us now knows beyond all doubt about our murderous, cowardly leaders, passive disdain is perhaps the most pernicious of public crimes.

More than a million marching on London was not enough to prevent Blair perpetrating the unspeakable war crime of Iraq; democracy thus demands – in the genuine sense of that word – that we raise the bar.

We need to start preparing now.

March 15 :: 12 noon :: Trafalgar Square :: London

The truth-reversal of the Bush regime reached such epic proportions so long ago now that we should avoid getting bogged down in the detail. Quite simply what we are witnessing is larceny and murder on a genocidal scale – the brazen annexing of sovereign lands for both their immediate resources and the geopolitical leverage their scorched, broken earth will provide Western governments.

The US military can quite simply be called, to coin Michael Klare’s memorable phrase, an ‘oil police force’ – carrying out policies whose genesis stretches back to WW2 and beyond and which have been sustained and exacerbated by every successive US president. Namely: aggressively militarising the world’s primary energy zones (Persian Gulf, Caspian Basin) at any human cost in order to guarantee an unwavering flow of oil and thereby maintain US world dominance. What we are seeing – yet, indeed, failing to actually grasp – is the simple continuation of this violent geopolitical rape.

Nancy Romer of US Labour Against the War gave one of the most rapturously-received deliveries on December 4th. “What is occurring,” she explained with searing clarity, “is essentially a policy of wealth transference” – the transposition of resources from an increasingly taxed US working class and their conscripted children (currently dying and laying waste to the Middle East), via the rebuilding contracts subsequently offered to Western corporations, and finally back to the coffers of elite multinational shareholders. A trail of dollars and blood that stretches halfway around the world and back.

Our government, who have been quick to ensure that British firms get their due slice of the rebuilding pie, are utterly complicit in this deception, murderous exploitation and mass slaughter.

Iran has every right to pursue nuclear technology. It is as simple as that. The only responsibility the US and UK have in the Middle East, under international law, is to leave.

Even leaving aside such self-evident truths, we might reflect on the fact that the only country to aggressively detonate nuclear warheads in history is the United States of America. And furthermore, the only despots to actually perpetrate “mass destruction”, using weapons, in the Middle East in the past decade, are Bush, Blair and and their willing cohorts.

Our goverments are liars and murderers.

It is no longer enough to condemn them from afar.

9 comments:

Jon Severs said...

Regardless of your thoughts on going to war, i don't see how pulling out and leaving them to it is any more 'moral' than going to war in the first place. I didn't necessarilly agree with it either, but I think leaving them to a civil war that we essentially created would be a real betrayal. I am a big believer in cleaning up any mess i have created, and in this instance we have created a massive mess. By all means a criticism and analysis of the process which led us to war is legitamate, and needed. and protests are all well and good, but a full pull out of Iraq could create some catastrophic problems for both Iraq and ourselves. It is often not the troops who are attacked, after all, it is Iraqis killing each other. We created the circumstances that lets that happen, and we should do our best to put the situation back together. Leaving would not do this, perhaps staying does not either. But until a 'third way' is found, we have a duty to protect those we have put in danger.

All oil and financial benefits, scanadlous and unforgivable, I take as a given. That i am in full agreement with!

Good to see you blogging mate, see you sooooon.

Ewen said...

Hello matey…

I wasn’t talking about a ‘moral’ reponsibility, as clearly our intentions in ‘going to war’ (occupying illegally) were the antithesis of moral.

My mention of our ‘responsibility’ was in reference to the US/UK’s self-ordained ‘duty’ as policers of the Middle East (and indeed the world) – the disgraceful pretences under which we ‘liberated’ Iraq and now make similar noises over Iran.

In the absence – quite clearly – of anything but misinformation, lies and genocide from the US/UK occupiers, international law and the UN Charter are the only solid yardsticks in a firestorm of brazen imperialism and violent burning.

We have, of course, trampled those agreements into the dust already – along with Iraq.

A ‘real betrayal’ is not what will result if we withdraw; a ‘real betrayal’ is what has already taken place. It is what takes place on a daily basis.

Be very clear: Iraq has the second largest reserves of oil of any country – some 10 per cent of the world’s stocks – and easily-accessible reserves too. It is wealthy beyond comprehension, with a health and education infrastructure unparalleled in the region, prior to twenty years of slaughter and sanctions… Left alone, it will rise again.

The US hawks, of course, know this, and have always known it. It is the very reason we raped and occupied this strategic jewel in the first place. Iraq and Saudi Arabia represent a Shiite-controlled expanse of the world’s major energy reserves (Chomsky’s ‘strange accident of geography’).

According to US foreign policy, this state of affairs simply cannot exist.

Consequently, the narrative that we ‘made a mistake’ that we should now ‘help clean up’ is a very harmful and dangerous one.

I can only attempt to disabuse you of this notion in the strongest possible terms.

This version of events serves the state very well indeed: in it, we are cast us as the benevolent – if flawed – benefactors of a clutch of tortured, oppressed victims. It utterly obscures the fact that the US/UK annexing of Iraq was nothing but a deliberate and strategic geopolitical exercise.

The US, quite simply, has real motive in staying in Iraq. The real issue is not whether withdrawing/staying fulfils our ‘duty’, or whether withdrawing/staying would be even more of a ‘disaster’ for Iraqis. The real issue is as far from this notion as possible. The real issue is that leaving a sovereign Iraq to its own devices would be a disaster for US foreign policy makers.

The media in the country, especially the ‘liberal’ media, are hugely responsible for the dissemination and perpetuation of these ‘status-quo’ myths.

If civil war exists in Iraq, then it is clear that the occupation is exacerbating it.

More than a million have paid with their lives for our ‘mess’. Making it less a ‘mess,’ more a holocaust.

Jon Severs said...

Interesting mate, don't agree, but hey, the world would be boring if we all did :)see ya soon, i should be recovered from my bad eye this time next year...lol. might be better enough for some footy soon tho.

Ewen said...

You might find the article PDF that’s linked in the piece below interesting matey. It contains many parallels can be drawn with our appreciation of events over here…

http://ewen-cook.blogspot.com/2007/11/norman-solomon-talks-to-adrian-zupp.html

geordie said...

Damned if we do, damned if don't.

(I'm not normally one for reducing discourse to cliche, but sometimes it's just appropriate.)

There's quite an interesting piece about al-Sadr in this month's Esquire, incidentally.

Ewen said...

Indeed Christopher...

Either way, "damned" is about as bad as it gets for us though, isn't it?

I'm sure there are plenty of displaced, bereaved Iraqis that would be mighty happy to trade.

More than a million, in fact.

geordie said...

Well, I did mean they're damned if we do/don't...

Getting out is of course necessary, but are Iraq's security forces strong enough to take over? Bear in mind that a power vaccuum is what created the current problem in the first place.

(Well, the part of the problem that wasn't caused by simple, old-fashioned warmongering, at any rate.)

On a related note, have you seen anything of the campaign to make special asylum arrangements for Iraqi civilians under threat for working with British forces?

Ewen said...

I'm glad son!

No I haven't seen that...

Drop me a line some time old chap.

Ewen said...

40,000 turned up on Saturday, far more than were expected, and it was a fantastic response.

Which is more than we'll get from our cowardly, murderous government, of course...